<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Casino Royale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-5678</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-5678</guid>
		<description>When I was 10, I was bored. I&#039;m now 15 and it&#039;s great. Quintessentially Bond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was 10, I was bored. I&#8217;m now 15 and it&#8217;s great. Quintessentially Bond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dj münchen</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-5569</link>
		<dc:creator>dj münchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-5569</guid>
		<description>for Bond - Fans -first a bit strange . But now , I love it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for Bond &#8211; Fans -first a bit strange . But now , I love it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hayavadhan</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-5503</link>
		<dc:creator>hayavadhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-5503</guid>
		<description>beautiful titling i would say.. :-).. infact the best part of the movie ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beautiful titling i would say.. <img src='http://www.artofthetitle.com/v3/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .. infact the best part of the movie <img src='http://www.artofthetitle.com/v3/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliot John Gates</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-5341</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliot John Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-5341</guid>
		<description>Bah, I disagree. To me this one of the best openings with the graphics, surrealist art and two bullets in the seven of hearts card. Pure genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, I disagree. To me this one of the best openings with the graphics, surrealist art and two bullets in the seven of hearts card. Pure genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ttipton1</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-5292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ttipton1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-5292</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Doug, this was a beautiful sequence and perhaps the best of the series. Was astounded when EON used Foster&#039;s pick for &quot;Quantum of Solace,&quot; will always wonder how Kleinman would have made that more memorable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Doug, this was a beautiful sequence and perhaps the best of the series. Was astounded when EON used Foster&#8217;s pick for &#8220;Quantum of Solace,&#8221; will always wonder how Kleinman would have made that more memorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ttipton1</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-5293</link>
		<dc:creator>Ttipton1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-5293</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Doug, this was a beautiful sequence and perhaps the best of the series. Was astounded when EON used Foster&#039;s pick for &quot;Quantum of Solace,&quot; will always wonder how Kleinman would have made that more memorable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Doug, this was a beautiful sequence and perhaps the best of the series. Was astounded when EON used Foster&#8217;s pick for &#8220;Quantum of Solace,&#8221; will always wonder how Kleinman would have made that more memorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-5108</guid>
		<description>This is one of my favorite movie opens of all time. Period. Full Stop. And actually I think this title sequence is probably one of the best Bond sequences in the pack. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of my favorite movie opens of all time. Period. Full Stop. And actually I think this title sequence is probably one of the best Bond sequences in the pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>My apologies in regards to not giving your father proper credit as designer of those titles. As I said, I think they are some of the most iconic and impressive designs of the films.
It was a shame he didn&#039;t do any others.  Was this his decision, or the producers? I DID know he was the designer - put it down to having a senior moment.  Again, apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies in regards to not giving your father proper credit as designer of those titles. As I said, I think they are some of the most iconic and impressive designs of the films.<br />
It was a shame he didn&#8217;t do any others.  Was this his decision, or the producers? I DID know he was the designer &#8211; put it down to having a senior moment.  Again, apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brownjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>brownjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 04:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>Just for your info, my father Robert Brownjohn created the titles for &quot;From Russia with Love&quot; and the very best and iconic &quot;Goldfinger.&quot; Maurice Binder did not have anything to do with these titles which won every award possible! Thought you should know.

- Eliza Brownjohn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for your info, my father Robert Brownjohn created the titles for &#8220;From Russia with Love&#8221; and the very best and iconic &#8220;Goldfinger.&#8221; Maurice Binder did not have anything to do with these titles which won every award possible! Thought you should know.</p>
<p>- Eliza Brownjohn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/01/14/casino-royale/comment-page-1/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=8#comment-4153</guid>
		<description>I am probably biased being a graphic designer and independent filmmaker, but I don&#039;t understand the negative comments about CR&#039;s title sequence at all.

I&#039;v always enjoyed the Bond film&#039;s title sequences over the years.  The most impressive to me were FRWL (it might seem low budget by today&#039;s standards, but one can&#039;t ignore the sheer exotic nature of the credits sliding along a belly dancer&#039;s body; Goldfinger (how could they have shown anything else except the iconic gold painted female?); OHMSS (images of passing time and scenes from previous films).  I was disappointed by Binder&#039;s work after that.  It seemed to get repetitive and almost lazy.  Just dancing or posing or swimming nudes with Bond shooting at off-screen targets (or Bond and or the women jumping around).  I think Binder got either stuck in a rut and or the producers kept him from trying anything new.  Thank goodness Kleinman was hired.  Goldeneye was a beautiful mesh of CGI and the iconic images of the old Soviet Union crumbling along with a nod to Binder&#039;s use of guns and nudes.  I didn&#039;t like TND - too much x-ray and computer circuits - seemed to clutter up the whole sequence. Kleinmans idea of using the oil and nudes combo in TWINE was well done, though I though he was over using the nude icons like Binder did. DAD was much better - using the torture scenes and the fire and ice pain images was more creative (too bad they went with Madonna&#039;s out of place disco dance song), but again - to much reliance on the nudes.  

I was astonished and delighted by the CR titles.  Throw out the nudes and the dancing and jumping and posing.  Let&#039;s have Bond fighting baddies!  Yay!  Let&#039;s fill it with iconic moving images of playing cards and their graphics and roulette wheels and the baddies breaking apart into the different suites!  Let&#039;s put an aggressive inyourface jazzrock song to it!  My only embarrassement was showing the closeup of Craig.  It was a little overdone for me - I think I would have preferred having his figure continue walking towards the viewer in silhouette, raising the gun straight at the camera and firing without showing him.  The blast from the barrel would have been a nice transition to the opening scene.

I was very disappointed with MK12 on Quantum.  I hope the producers can get Kleinman back.  I found those titles too disorienting, unfocused and monochromatic.  The nudes were so hidden by close ups and the sand motif they were almost invisible.  Then they are shown dancing around some type of weird wireframe art (what was that supposed to be?).  I HATED the camera flying around everything..it was like trying to read a book while riding in a rollercoaster!  The moving titles were okay, using the old moving bullethole intro motif of the 60&#039;s films.

I would love it if the next film would either not use dozens of nudes and Bond again, or at least just a few times.  It would also be nice if the next theme song writer could find a way of writing lyrics without using these words - kill or any variation of it; eyes, eye, target,sights,etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am probably biased being a graphic designer and independent filmmaker, but I don&#8217;t understand the negative comments about CR&#8217;s title sequence at all.</p>
<p>I&#8217;v always enjoyed the Bond film&#8217;s title sequences over the years.  The most impressive to me were FRWL (it might seem low budget by today&#8217;s standards, but one can&#8217;t ignore the sheer exotic nature of the credits sliding along a belly dancer&#8217;s body; Goldfinger (how could they have shown anything else except the iconic gold painted female?); OHMSS (images of passing time and scenes from previous films).  I was disappointed by Binder&#8217;s work after that.  It seemed to get repetitive and almost lazy.  Just dancing or posing or swimming nudes with Bond shooting at off-screen targets (or Bond and or the women jumping around).  I think Binder got either stuck in a rut and or the producers kept him from trying anything new.  Thank goodness Kleinman was hired.  Goldeneye was a beautiful mesh of CGI and the iconic images of the old Soviet Union crumbling along with a nod to Binder&#8217;s use of guns and nudes.  I didn&#8217;t like TND &#8211; too much x-ray and computer circuits &#8211; seemed to clutter up the whole sequence. Kleinmans idea of using the oil and nudes combo in TWINE was well done, though I though he was over using the nude icons like Binder did. DAD was much better &#8211; using the torture scenes and the fire and ice pain images was more creative (too bad they went with Madonna&#8217;s out of place disco dance song), but again &#8211; to much reliance on the nudes.  </p>
<p>I was astonished and delighted by the CR titles.  Throw out the nudes and the dancing and jumping and posing.  Let&#8217;s have Bond fighting baddies!  Yay!  Let&#8217;s fill it with iconic moving images of playing cards and their graphics and roulette wheels and the baddies breaking apart into the different suites!  Let&#8217;s put an aggressive inyourface jazzrock song to it!  My only embarrassement was showing the closeup of Craig.  It was a little overdone for me &#8211; I think I would have preferred having his figure continue walking towards the viewer in silhouette, raising the gun straight at the camera and firing without showing him.  The blast from the barrel would have been a nice transition to the opening scene.</p>
<p>I was very disappointed with MK12 on Quantum.  I hope the producers can get Kleinman back.  I found those titles too disorienting, unfocused and monochromatic.  The nudes were so hidden by close ups and the sand motif they were almost invisible.  Then they are shown dancing around some type of weird wireframe art (what was that supposed to be?).  I HATED the camera flying around everything..it was like trying to read a book while riding in a rollercoaster!  The moving titles were okay, using the old moving bullethole intro motif of the 60&#8242;s films.</p>
<p>I would love it if the next film would either not use dozens of nudes and Bond again, or at least just a few times.  It would also be nice if the next theme song writer could find a way of writing lyrics without using these words &#8211; kill or any variation of it; eyes, eye, target,sights,etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.422 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 21:33:22 -->

