<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-5553</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-5553</guid>
		<description>magnificent! enough said. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>magnificent! enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-5067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-5067</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree. Having seen the film I really think it fits perfectly. This is just what it needs: less is more. It&#039;s because of the style of the director and the music in question, that it has to be silent and a bit brutal (you know if you&#039;ve seen it). Standard shouldn&#039;t set any minimum length or such, as there&#039;s nothing missing here.

Also, as a film, I strongly recommend it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree. Having seen the film I really think it fits perfectly. This is just what it needs: less is more. It&#8217;s because of the style of the director and the music in question, that it has to be silent and a bit brutal (you know if you&#8217;ve seen it). Standard shouldn&#8217;t set any minimum length or such, as there&#8217;s nothing missing here.</p>
<p>Also, as a film, I strongly recommend it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Since we are talking about titling... I would say that this obb, is not a glamour one.. 

But having a standard is not a good idea. This generation of new born artists are part of postmodernism which suggests that there should be no standard for art, for it is broad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we are talking about titling&#8230; I would say that this obb, is not a glamour one.. </p>
<p>But having a standard is not a good idea. This generation of new born artists are part of postmodernism which suggests that there should be no standard for art, for it is broad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sincerely</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Sincerely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-385</guid>
		<description>W H E R E  A R E  T H E  T I T L E S ?

I Sincerely think this is an ofense.
Put this down.
What a shame to art.
Amarrador, haz algo con tu trabajo, apacionate, no seas tan vagao balvaraso!
VAGO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W H E R E  A R E  T H E  T I T L E S ?</p>
<p>I Sincerely think this is an ofense.<br />
Put this down.<br />
What a shame to art.<br />
Amarrador, haz algo con tu trabajo, apacionate, no seas tan vagao balvaraso!<br />
VAGO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnC</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-384</guid>
		<description>I agree with Richard and Diaghe. There needs to be a standard. Maybe, to VMAN&#039;s point, if the rest was posted, we&#039;d get a better idea of the title sequence.

A friend of mine and I were going to have a discussion at our agency about titles similar to this one. The category was called &quot;introductory titles&quot; where there is an emotional introduction to the plot or characters of the film, followed by the title(s). We felt that this was well implemented in the film Snatch, where it jumps right to the point (Turkish talking about diamonds), then the security camera sequence, and as if that weren&#039;t enough, it&#039;s followed by the fast paced character intro revolving around the diamond. Anyone&#039;s thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Richard and Diaghe. There needs to be a standard. Maybe, to VMAN&#8217;s point, if the rest was posted, we&#8217;d get a better idea of the title sequence.</p>
<p>A friend of mine and I were going to have a discussion at our agency about titles similar to this one. The category was called &#8220;introductory titles&#8221; where there is an emotional introduction to the plot or characters of the film, followed by the title(s). We felt that this was well implemented in the film Snatch, where it jumps right to the point (Turkish talking about diamonds), then the security camera sequence, and as if that weren&#8217;t enough, it&#8217;s followed by the fast paced character intro revolving around the diamond. Anyone&#8217;s thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-383</guid>
		<description>I think its quite beautiful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its quite beautiful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>VMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Im torn on this one.  This is called art of the title but there is no titling per-say, however i&#039;ve always been hooked into scenes that open up like this.. Meaning some dramatic open that leads into an explosive title sequence.. so where&#039;s the rest of this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im torn on this one.  This is called art of the title but there is no titling per-say, however i&#8217;ve always been hooked into scenes that open up like this.. Meaning some dramatic open that leads into an explosive title sequence.. so where&#8217;s the rest of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-381</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not the point. If that was the case then every film in history would be on here. If we don&#039;t argue for a standard then we should just call the site &quot;Titles.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not the point. If that was the case then every film in history would be on here. If we don&#8217;t argue for a standard then we should just call the site &#8220;Titles.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarksVFX</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>MarksVFX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Even a bad reference is a reference. It&#039;s not flashy but it does what it needs to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even a bad reference is a reference. It&#8217;s not flashy but it does what it needs to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diaghe</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2008/10/17/control/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Diaghe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=505#comment-378</guid>
		<description>I agree, this is awful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this is awful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

