<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single Take Titles, Part 3: Steadicam’s Long Take</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>In the discussion of _Snake Eyes_ we should also note the last shot in the film, which is on the boardwalk and slowly zooms in to the wall with the ring embedded, which ALSO lasts 13 minutes, going on as the credits roll.  A great set of bookends to the film, and the last one is much less flashy, is unnoticed since 95% of the audience is walking out, and indeed, _is_ in one cut without trick edits.

Cheers, Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the discussion of _Snake Eyes_ we should also note the last shot in the film, which is on the boardwalk and slowly zooms in to the wall with the ring embedded, which ALSO lasts 13 minutes, going on as the credits roll.  A great set of bookends to the film, and the last one is much less flashy, is unnoticed since 95% of the audience is walking out, and indeed, _is_ in one cut without trick edits.</p>
<p>Cheers, Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Featured Website: The Art of the Title Sequence :: Bamboo Chicken Film Making Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Featured Website: The Art of the Title Sequence :: Bamboo Chicken Film Making Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>[...] Single Take Titles: Steadycam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Single Take Titles: Steadycam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed the 3-part blog of the single take. There is one, I think, is the mother of all single take tracking shots that wasn&#039;t mentioned. &quot;Goodfellas&quot;. It was one of the first times that a Steadicam was used to track a long shot sequence like that in a film. I just feel like it was worth mentioning. I do recognize that the article is about title sequences. The sequence I am mentioning doesn&#039;t happen until approximately 20 minutes into the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed the 3-part blog of the single take. There is one, I think, is the mother of all single take tracking shots that wasn&#8217;t mentioned. &#8220;Goodfellas&#8221;. It was one of the first times that a Steadicam was used to track a long shot sequence like that in a film. I just feel like it was worth mentioning. I do recognize that the article is about title sequences. The sequence I am mentioning doesn&#8217;t happen until approximately 20 minutes into the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandora&#8217;s Link &#124; Action Movies Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandora&#8217;s Link &#124; Action Movies Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>[...] phrased it so damningly and I hope he doesn&#8217;t think that&#8217;s the extent of the criticism.art of the title sequence on a few long steadicam openings. Boogie Nights is my all time favorite (in this field) but I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phrased it so damningly and I hope he doesn&#8217;t think that&#8217;s the extent of the criticism.art of the title sequence on a few long steadicam openings. Boogie Nights is my all time favorite (in this field) but I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fluffy Links &#8211; Tuesday December 22nd 2009 &#171; Damien Mulley</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Fluffy Links &#8211; Tuesday December 22nd 2009 &#171; Damien Mulley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Art of the Title is one of the best single take steadicam opening scenes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Art of the Title is one of the best single take steadicam opening scenes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randolph Sellars</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Randolph Sellars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;The Russian Ark?&quot;  It had a steadicam shot that went well beyond the opening sequence - the whole film was one single steadicam shot.

For those wondering, it was shot on HD and recorded on a hard drive.  Despite it&#039;s subject (history of Russian art) and lack of appeal for American audiences, I think that it is one of the most amazing shots in the history of cinema. It certainly qualifies as the most rigorous steadicam shot ever - a real marathon. The operator walked for over a mile through hallways, up and down staircases, walked outside, and then back inside. The final shot was completed on the third take after two aborted takes. They only had time and light for one last attempt. Talk about pressure and stamina.

Even if the subject doesn&#039;t engage everyone, every director, DP, and operator should see the film and marvel at the accomplishment - the planning, staging, and blocking are nearly flawless.  Lots of details on the DVD extras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;The Russian Ark?&#8221;  It had a steadicam shot that went well beyond the opening sequence &#8211; the whole film was one single steadicam shot.</p>
<p>For those wondering, it was shot on HD and recorded on a hard drive.  Despite it&#8217;s subject (history of Russian art) and lack of appeal for American audiences, I think that it is one of the most amazing shots in the history of cinema. It certainly qualifies as the most rigorous steadicam shot ever &#8211; a real marathon. The operator walked for over a mile through hallways, up and down staircases, walked outside, and then back inside. The final shot was completed on the third take after two aborted takes. They only had time and light for one last attempt. Talk about pressure and stamina.</p>
<p>Even if the subject doesn&#8217;t engage everyone, every director, DP, and operator should see the film and marvel at the accomplishment &#8211; the planning, staging, and blocking are nearly flawless.  Lots of details on the DVD extras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoff pedder</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>geoff pedder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>Outbreak has a crafty cut in too.. on the guy we follow into the ultra security area. Nice article though, I love steadicam work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outbreak has a crafty cut in too.. on the guy we follow into the ultra security area. Nice article though, I love steadicam work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Brune</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>John Brune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>Yes this is mentioned in the commentary track on the DVD.  The cut is invisible and you would only know it&#039;s there if someone told you--like Joss Whedon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this is mentioned in the commentary track on the DVD.  The cut is invisible and you would only know it&#8217;s there if someone told you&#8211;like Joss Whedon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel c w</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1563</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel c w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1563</guid>
		<description>Serinity&#039;s title sequence may be a one piece, but it has one cut, and very likely was 2 shots.
The ship was built on 2 stages, one for the upper deck, one for the lower.
When the Captain walks down the stairs, a cut is visible, if you know, what you have to look for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serinity&#8217;s title sequence may be a one piece, but it has one cut, and very likely was 2 shots.<br />
The ship was built on 2 stages, one for the upper deck, one for the lower.<br />
When the Captain walks down the stairs, a cut is visible, if you know, what you have to look for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Single Take Titles, Part 3: Steadicam's Long Take - &#124; The Art of the Title Sequence -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.artofthetitle.com/2009/12/21/single-take-titles-part-3-steadicams-long-take/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Single Take Titles, Part 3: Steadicam's Long Take - &#124; The Art of the Title Sequence -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofthetitle.com/?p=4469#comment-1562</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Daniel Kutz, MagmellAgentur. MagmellAgentur said: Endlich: »Single Take Titles, Part 3: Steadicam’s Long Take« (mit zwei De-Palma-Klassikern) http://bit.ly/7YddUC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Daniel Kutz, MagmellAgentur. MagmellAgentur said: Endlich: »Single Take Titles, Part 3: Steadicam’s Long Take« (mit zwei De-Palma-Klassikern) <a href="http://bit.ly/7YddUC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7YddUC</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

