Casino Royale

Casino Royale
Click to Watch

Click to Watch 720p HD Version

Direct Link | Format: QuickTime H.264, 848×352 | Size: 35.1 MB | Running Time: 3:20 | Year: 2006
720p HD Version | Format: QuickTime H.264, 1280×528 | Size: 74.6 MB | Running Time: 3:20 | Year: 2006



Created by Daniel Kleinman

18 Comments so far

  1. Daniel on June 20th, 2008

    I really didn’t like this. What with the rest of the film pretty much succeeding at the whole franchise-reboot thing, it’s as if nobody bothered to try anything new with the opening credits. It was just all a bit “is that it?”. Fortunately it gets a LOT better.

  2. Michael on August 27th, 2008

    I always loved the intro sequences of the 007 movies and I was actually glad that they kept the style in this sequence. Nothing was ever wrong with the titles so why change it.

  3. Paul Baack on August 28th, 2008

    I count three of Danny Kleinman’s James Bond titles sequences as being amongst the very best in the series — in order, GoldenEye, Casino Royale, and Tomorrow Never Dies. That’s just my personal opinion, of course, but I was concerned about the increasing use of grotesqueries in his work. The imagery of oil-coated women in his The World Is Not Enough piece, and the “Fire” and “Ice” female…[i] creatures[/i] he created for the Die Another Day titles sequence were, I felt, extremely offputting (if otherwise extremely well-accomplished).

    I was hugely relieved by, and ecstatically happy with this piece he created for Casino Royale. The almost 100% animation of it brings a vague recall of Maurice Binder’s work on Dr. No, while the complexity of it points to a whole new direction for the Bond picture titles. As is the case with all of Kleinman’s work, he continues to honor the history of the tradition, without slavishly aping his celebrated predecessor.

    Plus, I loved the Mandelbrot Set-like exploding “clubs” sigils — just too damn cool!

  4. Chris on August 29th, 2008

    I thought this was an interesting direction for the Bond titles, and glad that it didn’t leap straight into the girls ‘n’ guns motifs that had dominated the franchise for so long.

    Eva Green’s face appearing was, I thought, a bit superfluous and doesn’t sit so well with the rest of the imagery. It’s the one part of the sequence that irks me. I would have loved to have seen the whole done as animation without the actors appearing at all – except for that last moment of Craig stepping towards the camera as the credits end and the music hits it’s crescendo.

    On the other hand, I can understand a production house wanting to get it’s money on the screen as soon as possible.

  5. Tama on September 13th, 2008

    What I like most about this sequence as the 2 dimensional opening, alluding to past Bond credits, then the move through Mandelbrot graphics to really iconic 3d vector visualisation to suggest the reboot (and thus the extra dimension) of the franchise! :)

  6. Bonka on October 13th, 2008

    Oh my god. This is one of the saddest titles ever. It is so unengaging, slow and without any kind of drama or punch or relation whatsoever, that I remember hoping for something to happen the whole title sequence… “Please, please - could this really be the worst Bond title ever? Can it? Come on! Do something about it!”.

    The 2d/3d action sequences are somewhat cool, but nothing in this vignette really gives any clue of anything, and the idea-base seems being planted on dry ground. Yes there are some references to cards here, and the characters are somewhat pointy, but thats it. Oh yeah, and there is a guy that fires a gun. Cool.

    Even the bullets seem bored of being fired, and when Eva Green appears, it has just gone totally mental for me. Are you kidding me?! Who let that detail pass?!

    The only good about this title sequence is at the end. Where it ends.

  7. joris on October 30th, 2008

    I, too, was very disappointed when I saw it for the first time. There’s no mystery, no ominous feel, no ‘darkness’, and funny enough, despite the graphics, not really a strong graphical feel, except maybe for the 3D fight sequences, who look a bit cheap and flat. The music also sounds quite uninspired. It’s well-executed, but perhaps wrong movie…
    Maybe I excpected too much?

  8. Adam on November 1st, 2008

    Am I the only one that see’s the connection between the setting, plot, characters, and the whole theme of the movie within these titles?

    These titles are modern, sleek and sophisticated. The creativity uses the main theme superbly. Being a game of cards at a casino, the patterns and symbols provide the perfect backdrop.

    When James Bond finally appears, that in itself was the perfect visual anecdote for the new actor playing Bond — almost a reintroduction to Bond perhaps.

    And when Eva Green appears, it is very subtle. Especially when so much is happening around.

    I love this sequence. Kudos to Mr. Kleinman.

  9. Michael [Boicozine] on November 1st, 2008

    I’ve always found Daniel Kleinman’s heavy handed CGI work pretty overblown. It was nice to see them pull it back for this film but it could have been even sparcer I think. I saw Quantum of Solace last night and MK12 have taken over and the titles look great. It’s nice to see the designers paying attention to the typography too. It would have been nice to see what Logan would have done with it… http://www.logan.tv/

  10. Jonathan Huffman on November 16th, 2008

    These credits are some of the weaker ones in the Bond series. Quantum of Solace easily fixes that.

  11. Paul Baack on November 16th, 2008

    I know, I know — de gustibus non est disputandum, and all that, but I fail to see how the QOS titles sequence is in any way superior to Kleiman’s CR work. Quite the opposite, in fact. It looked to me like MK12 was doing a fannishly slavish copy of Kleinman, with fannishly amateurish results. I saw very few connections between the imagery used and the theme/plot/story of the movie itself. The typography was reasonably cool, as was the “camera” tracking the path of the bullet, but, for me, the overall effect was “meh.” Not the worst titles sequence in the series; better even than Maurice Binder’s 70s and 80s output; but mediocre just the same.

  12. Pau on November 16th, 2008

    I think these credits look quite good. Far better than the ones for the previous three films (just women with fire and ink effects…). Goldeneye’s where good too.

  13. Bill on December 2nd, 2008

    The thing that saves these credits for me is Chris Cornell’s awesome song and singing voice. I have been a huge fan of his since Soundgarden. He is a very underrated singer in my opinion. I think the credits do tie into to what the film is about too though.

  14. Patrick Mazzolo (Paddymazz) on December 4th, 2008

    I loved this introduction. One of the best Bond intro sequences.
    Although, the Quantum of Solace titles are well done too!

  15. Hollis on December 10th, 2008

    I thought that these were some of the most artistic opening sequences to date. I loved the animation, especially the constant casino-theme. I do, however, wonder how it was done? I would love to make something like that…

  16. Ricky on December 21st, 2008

    The best title sequence of the entire Bond series. MK12’s work on Quantum of Solace is good but not up to Daniel Kleinman’s standard. Here’s hoping he’s back for Bond 23.

  17. Benjamin on December 25th, 2008

    I really like this one, especially the fight sequence!

  18. Miguel Valdez-Lopez on December 30th, 2008

    Mandelbrot rules!

    I’m just sorry for the Quantum of Solace title sequence. That was a boring, repetitive and monochromatic experience!

Leave a Reply