The Art of the Title Sequence

Alien Quadrilogy Analysis

Note the consistency of design in the title sequences to the Alien Quadrilogy. Note too how they differ. Does each tangent of theme reflect the respective film?

ALIEN

Crossing over an eclipsing planet with the title appearing in non-linear, segmented letters. From the outer letters inwards (even the middle swath of the letter "E" is last to appear). Everything pointing to the center because the center is where the parasitic pupae of the Alien comes from; the middle of you. Steady, dark tension.

ALIENS

The sparse, soldiering snare drum opening to an almost digital yet organic titling, like the profile of some never before seen hive. The text, apparitional at first, seems to be gestating; the "I" blooms into a symbol of life and we are in the story with a masterful tilt down on the encroaching vessel. Fairly glorious.

ALIEN³

The last brassy notes of the Twentieth Century Fox theme holds and contorts into the reverberating growl of the film's soundscape. Then, the familiarity of the abyss punctuated by staccato, mini cut scenes that move the story along. New format, familiar threads...the wrinkle, we begin to understand, will be in the telling. Nothing comforts quite like facehuggers interrupting stasis to earn cinematic trust!

ALIEN RESURRECTION

The womb-like viscera of human and alien-crossed monstrosities connotes a bastardization.

Extras

Video Extra iconAlien: Resurrection - Alternate

Alien: Resurrection - Alternate contact sheet Click to Watch SD | iPod/iPhone

Conceptually interesting but perhaps too great a departure. And no one puts bug guts anywhere near their mouth. Not unless they are chocolate covered and never if they're space bugs. And who fires spitballs at a window needed for navigation? I can't seem to get past that, even with the now-boilerplate spaceships in space shot.

DETAILS

Alien:

  • UK/USA
  • 1979
  • Color
  • 2:20:1
  • English/Spanish





Aliens:

  • USA/UK
  • 1986
  • Color
  • 1.85:1
  • English





Alien³:

  • USA
  • 1992
  • Color
  • 2.20:1
  • English





Alien Resurrection:

  • USA
  • 1997
  • Black and White/Color
  • 2.35:1
  • English
CREDITS

Alien - Title Design: Richard Greenberg

Aliens - Opticals: Peerless Camera Co., London

Alien³ - Title Design: John Beach, Black Box K°
Titles and Opticals: Pacific Title

Alien Resurrection - Titles and Opticals: Pacific Title

Category: Features, News

Tagged: , , ,

  • http://www.groovymarlin.com/blog Groovymarlin

    I loved watching these – thank you. At first I honestly thought that last, alternate title sequence for “Resurrection” was a joke. Perhaps that’s why they didn’t use it. It plays a little too much like the “Scary Movie” version of the Alien franchise.

  • Lu Nelson

    Also worth noting in the ALIENS sequence: the music is the same piece of music used during the JUPITER MISSION section of 2001, for long slow shots of the space craft. Probably Cameron’s homage to Kubrick; and it situates the film as a space movie in a broader sense than just as a sequel to Ridley Scott’s film. Thanks for posting these

    • http://le0pard13.blogspot.com le0pard13

      The musical sequence you’re referring to here (and from 2001 A Space Odyssey) is Khachaturian’s Adagio from his Gayne Ballet Suite. One of the most memorable and haunting pieces I heard in my youth of watching movies.

      BTW, a great analysis of the titles used for this series. Thanks for posting it.

      • Matthew McKinnon

        The piece used upfront in Aliens is, in fact, an ‘original’ James Horner composition.

        It may well be a Kubrick homage, but more likely a steal: Horner was notorious for ‘referencing’ his own and other composers’ work back then. He also uses this theme in Patriot Games, by the way. And I’m sure I’ve heard it in one of his earlier scores. BTW, there was so much from his earlier Star Trek scores rehashed in Aliens that it took me out of the film [no mean feat!] when I first watched it.

        Given that he had six weeks to compose his score for Aliens [in the pre-digital age], and the film wasn’t even finished yet, I can cut him some slack. But still…

  • Mark

    The opening of Aliens is my favorite. It just pumps me up for the things to come every time I watch this great movie (original theatrical version, not the extended version).

  • joris

    I still find the ‘Alien’ sequence amazing in its simplicity. It’s just a tracking shot over a simple matte painting, with the title appearing like hieroglyphs. Very stylish and tasteful.
    And indeed, the ‘Alien: Ressurection’ shown here is just totally bizarre and silly. Maybe a poor gone-wrong-attempt to mimic the Jean Pierre Jeunet humor in his earlier films?

    Thanks for this great site ! Very inspiring, thank you for all the work in posting
    these hi-res sequences…
    Joris

  • http://www.pm76.com Pol Mac

    I always loved the original with the simplicity of the symmetrical lines appearing. Always found that stunning how original and simple it was. The sound aswell still haunts me about the film. Yikes! Love the Aliens one too! Both just great films in their own right!

  • Brad

    The “Alien” and “Aliens” sequences are my favorite, but perhaps it’s because I like those movies better as a whole. I think the music in both sequences is key. For Aliens it really has a sinister feeling that builds up to that Aliens logo revealing with the “I” brightly shinning.

  • http://rockhoppermedia.blogspot.com Richard Cave

    The musical cue in Aliens is also used in Patriot Games, the sequence where jack Ryan is invited into the live ops chamber to watch a Special Forces Strike on the terrorist camp.

    Haunting and evocative

  • Mark

    To the above comment: James Horner composed some brilliant pieces in the 1980s; it’s no surprise he reused some of his work in other movies :)

  • Nelson B

    In ALIENS the score at the begining gives also a hint of the militia. Then the second score with the open space and the spaceship, as someone said, is the same as in 2001 and evokes a feeling of lonelyness. ALIEN3 opening is all about the music excellent piece. This 3 movies are all great.

    Alien Resurection there is nothing there. Total crap.

  • Mark

    None of the last two sequels’ opening titles comes near the first two in terms of artistry, style, design and execution.

    I do think, however, David Fincher is right in practically disowning Alien³; it is bad. Killing off two of the characters from the get-go who fought so hard to stay alive in Aliens? Unforgivable.

    Sigourney Weaver was the best thing about Alien: Resurrection.

  • Dash_X

    SAUL BASS did the Alien sequence – he was and still is the master of this medium. Astonishingly beautiful.

  • http://rcrocha.blogspot.com Roger C. Rocha

    ALIEN is masterful, beautiful, with pristine and unique font animation. Timeless.

    ALIENS conveys the update in style and narrative of the movie very well.

    ALIEN 3 is really a complicated subject. Even though I believe Fincher’s direction is overall excellent, the problem with the movie lies within the screenplay. Look it up. They were going to make a “wooden planet”, for god’s sake. The actual result was pretty decent. BTW, the title sequence is pure Fincher, circa his more “music video” days.

    Number 4 is totally disposable. Leave it to a french director to ruin the genre. Also, “Fifth Element” rings a bell. RESURRECTION only made sense to me once, when I was totally baked.

    • Moogee

      There’s no excuses for Alien 3 being the weak movie that it was. No matter who you blame, ..the studio,  the screenplay, or the director, all I care about is what the film came out like. It sucked because they used that digital crap for the alien instead of a man in a suit. I think Fincher was not a wise choice for this movie anyhow.  Where was Guermo del Torre when you need him? They ruined this series starting with this movie. I still do watch it because I get some things out of it, but not a work of art or even close.

      • http://twitter.com/elindiotacuate Arnulfo Gillardi

        Who is Guermo del Torre? There´s this great film director whose name is Guillermo del Toro, maybe they´re related?

  • http://glenns-21st-review.blogspot.com/ MoonPatrol

    This is one of the best intros. It hints at something growing and that you better get your wits together quick or you will be in big trouble!

    Yes it is a gradual development as the words form, and alien in look too, like a bunch of symmetrical lines. Nothing but forms. The dissolves are also seen later in the wake-up scene around the white beds. Kind of tasty filmmaking! When the words come to full form and substance now the music jumps up and the time is now because the monster is coming! The brown planet (seen in 70mm at the theater) sets up that dark environment where our dreams and thoughts like to dwell. I like this movie because the experience it gives is storytelling in 4 dimensions. The genre is besides the point, the experience is just romantic in a survival sense, and a mystery that begs for the right choice of the characters.

    I hope they get that Alien 5 going and make it an experience! AVP and AVP Requiem are lesser creations!

  • Iammine78

    Alien 3 is not a shit movie. Yeah, I typed it. I’ll type it again if you want me to. It was doomed from expectations from the start. One day, David Fincher will wake up and realize how much better of a movie it is than say…Benjamin Button.

    From the standpoint of ‘story’, consider the length of time that had passed since ‘Aliens’. Would you have been happier if they had recast 10 year old Newt and dropped a ton of ‘make him look younger’ make-up on Michael Biehn? In more ways than not, they were left with no choice but to drop and start back at zero. ‘Alien’ was a horror movie set in space, we can all agree on that at this point. James Cameron came along and decided to make it a completely different movie. The only thing similar to a horror movie sequel was his decision to triple the characters to create a higher body count. Beyond that, he just wanted to make an action movie. Actual purists (who should get a life) should have been livid that he bastardized the original in such a manner.

    ‘Alien 3′ had no choice, really, but to go back to square one in the hopes of recreating a confined, horror movie type feel. While it wasn’t nearly as successful as the first one, it did have its moments. Most people bitch about the type of sequel it was without offering up any ideas as to what type of sequel it should have been.

  • http://twitter.com/henrieschnee henrieschnee

    For whatever reasons, there are two versions of the Alien 3 intro, the american depicted above and the european version, which lacks the computer generated voice over. Most people assume this to be a mastering bug of the original Quadrilogy-DVDs, but… I don’t know, I kind of prefer the european version. The lack of any narration or explanation gives it this eery 2001: A Space Odyssee-gone-horribly-wrong atmosphere.

    • http://www.artofthetitle.com/ Art of the Title

      I wasn’t aware of this. The PAL Quadrilogy DVD has the same audio mix as the NTSC version, complete with computer warning voice, so perhaps it was a mistake?

    • http://www.artofthetitle.com/ Art of the Title

      I wasn’t aware of this. The PAL Quadrilogy DVD has the same audio mix as the NTSC version, complete with computer warning voice, so perhaps it was a mistake?

  • Groovy

    Does somebody know, how the “aliens” intro was made? It looks kinda manually made. (Alien Intro is still my favourite, though)

Advertisement

Categories

Master Index

© 2011 The Art of the Title Sequence. All other names and trademarks appearing on ArtoftheTitle.com are the property of their respective owners.